Caracasus The corporate person aspect did occur to me, but the target resolution affirms the right of people to affirm their personal views. I think most people would understand that in the legal sense the pural of person is persons and that corporations, even as corporate persons, don't have personal views. Therefore I think it's reasonable to assume that when the resolution says people it means actual people.
The target is also pretty maximally nat sov friendly in that it affirms a core set of freedoms that must be allowed and leaves everything else to the discretion of the individual government. The repeal draft, in contrast, sets out to complete a list of everything that could be legally restricted, which to my thinking is far more intrusive. It's like saying "you can only do x" as opposed to "you can do anything except y."
Either way, this is almost certainly going to pass with big delegate support so the pressure will be on to ensure the eventual replacement is good. I honestly think UM's first attempt is dead in the water,
